February 19, 2010
Pawlenty Releases Budget Changes—Cuts All
Around
Gov. Tim Pawlenty presented his supplemental budget Monday that
outlines how he would erase a $1.2 billion state budget deficit.
Keeping with his ongoing pledge to not raise taxes, his budget
recommendations rely on cuts to his familiar targets of health care
and local government aid. He also relies on $387 million in federal
money that has not yet been approved by Congress.
For details on the Governor’s budget
recommendations, click on the following link to the Department of
Budget and Management:
http://www.mmb.state.mn.us/
The budget proposal cuts $347 million from
health and human services programs. About one-third of those savings
would come from reducing MinnesotaCare eligibility for single adults
from 250 percent of poverty ($27,084 a year) to 75 percent of
poverty ($8,124 a year). Another big cut is a 2.5 percent reduction
in payments to long-term care workers.
The proposed change would result in about
21,500 low-income workers losing their health care. MinnesotaCare is
a premium-based program for working Minnesotans that provides
subsidies on a sliding scale. If passed, the only adults without
children who would qualify for MinnesotaCare would be those who in
past years qualified for the General Assistance Medical Care
program. What is disappointing with these cuts is that
MinnesotaCare originally passed as a bipartisan effort designed to
help people move from welfare to work.
The proposal also undercuts Minnesota’s efforts
to achieve universal coverage and health care reform. The budget
proposal includes cutting $10 million from the State Health
Improvement Program – a statewide effort to reduce tobacco use and
obesity by making communities healthier – that was passed as part of
Minnesota’s 2008 Health Care Reform Act.
GAMC Passes the Legislature—Vetoed by
Governor
What looked like a bipartisan effort to save the GAMC program
was abruptly halted by Governor Pawlenty with his veto of a bill to
continue coverage Thursday night.
Efforts to maintain coverage for recipients of
General Assistance Medical Care (GAMC) continues to move quickly
through the Legislature. Governor Pawlenty has proposed
transferring these individuals into the MinnesotaCare program
beginning April 1, 2010. The DFL legislative leaders are proposing
maintaining a scaled back GAMC program with a 50 percent cut to
physician payments.
The Senate passed an amended proposal on
February 11 to continue the GAMC program. The Senate dropped a
funding source that would have assessed a surcharge on hospitals and
HMOs designed to draw down more federal Medicaid money, but
kept steep reimbursement cuts. The bill passed on a party-line vote
of 45 to 20, with DFL lawmakers supporting it.
Before passing the bill, the Senate dropped the
surcharge on hospitals and HMOs in response to indications that Gov.
Tim Pawlenty would veto a GAMC fix that included the surcharge. To
pay for the bill, the bill’s author Sen. Linda Berglin, DFL-Minneapolis,
proposed using $110 million that was scheduled to be transferred
from the General Fund to the Health Care Access Fund in 2011. The
$110 million transfer had been scheduled to cover the
additional costs expected to occur as a result of the governor's
plan to transfer GAMC enrollees to MinnesotaCare.
The House version of the bill, authored by Rep.
Erin Murphy, DFL-St. Paul, was passed on February 18 with a
bipartisan vote of 125-9. Many looked at this vote as a sign that
the Republican Governor would sign the bill. Surprisingly, Thursday
night he announced that he had vetoed the bill because it “does not
represent meaningful reform and does not address fundamental cost
issues.” Here’s a link to the Governor’s veto message.
Veto message
Legislative leaders said they will attempt to
override the Governor’s veto as early as February 22. In order to
be successful, they will have to convince at least three House
Republicans to vote for the override in order to get the two-thirds
vote needed.
Amended Dental Caries Bill Moves with MAFP
Support
Legislation encouraging physicians
to provide basic dental screenings for children as part of their
child and teen check up is moving forward.
HF 984 (Norton-DFL, Rochester) was amended last year in response
to MAFP concerns, from language that mandated that these services be
provided by physicians to language that says the Commissioner of
Human Services shall encourage physicians to provide these
services. The services would include a general visual exam of the
child's mouth without using probes or other dental equipment, a risk
assessment using the factors established by the American Academies
of Pediatrics and Pediatric Dentistry, and application of fluoride
varnish beginning at age 1 to those children assessed by the
provider as being high risk.
The bill passed the House Finance Committee on
February 16 and is awaiting final action on the House Floor.
The Senate companion bill
SF 633 (Berglin-DFL, Minneapolis) is in the Senate Finance
Committee. It still has the old language mandating the service, but
the expectation is that Senator Berglin will adopt the House
language.
Lyme Bill Compromise Reached with BMP
Legislation to limit the Board of Medical Practice’s (BMP)
ability to take action against a physician solely on the basis of
prescribing, administering, or dispensing long-term antibiotic
therapy to a patient who has been clinically diagnosed with chronic
Lyme disease was withdrawn for consideration in the House Health
Care & Human Services Policy and Oversight Committee on February 17
following a compromise agreement with the BMP.
The
bill
SF 1631 (Marty-DFL, Roseville) and HF 2597 (Ward-DFL, Brainerd),
would have put the BMP limitation in statute, creating a very bad
precedent of having the Legislature tell the BMP how to regulate
medical practice and how to define the standard of care. The MAFP
testified against the bill in the Senate.
Under the compromise, no legislation will move
forward and the BMP will voluntarily agree to a moratorium on taking
action related to Lyme disease for up to five years while more study
is done on the efficacy of long-term antibiotic therapy for Lyme.
Disposal of Unused Pharmaceuticals
Rep
Paul Gardner’s (DFL-Shoreview) bill
HF 1217 to establish “stewardship programs” for unused drugs
has passed two committees in the House. It has passed the
Environment Policy & Oversight Committee and the Health Care and
Human Service Policy & Oversight Committee. It still has to go
through the Crime Prevention Committee and the Finance Committee
before getting to the House Floor.
The programs would require wholesalers to
develop and fund drug take-back programs for unused drugs in order
to eliminate these drugs from being disposed in the sewer systems.
The bill would also clarify conflicting regulations where the
Minnesota Health Department requires health care facilities to flush
certain drugs, but the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency says it is
unlawful to do so.
The bill is being opposed by the drug
manufacturers, Life Science Alley, and the Minnesota Pharmacists
Association.
Chiropractic Practice Act Changes
The Minnesota Chiropractic Association is proposing legislation
to rewrite portions of the chiropractic practice act. The bill
would change the definition of chiropractic from “the science of
adjusting any abnormal articulations of the human body…” to “the
health care discipline which emphasizes the inherent recuperative
power of the body to heal itself without the use of prescription
drugs or surgery. Chiropractic focuses on the relationship between
structure, primarily the spine, and function, as coordinated by the
nervous system, and how that relationship affects the preservation
and restoration of health.” The bill would also authorize
chiropractors to use the term “Chiropractic Physician” with
patients.
This bill has not yet been introduced. The MAFP is reviewing it
and would appreciate member input on it. Input may be e-mailed to
drenner@mnmed.org.