Still Talking About
Changes in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations?
You Should Be...With Your Personal Physician
- Education from the
Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians -
August 2, 2010
If you’re a woman unsure about when to get your first mammogram,
you’re not alone. Patients across the state have been getting
mixed messages from clinic groups, the media, and other medical
organizations about breast screening guidelines after changes
were made by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).
The Task Force is an independent panel of experts in primary
care and prevention convened by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality. One common concern is based on a
misperception that the USPSTF recommended that women under the
age of 50 no longer need to get mammograms unless they’re in a
high-risk group. The actual intent of the recommendations, which
were based on recent data about mammography’s risks and benefits
for women at varying ages, was to get women and their physicians
to talk about the value of routine annual mammograms.
“I see it as an opportunity for personalized
cancer screening. As family physicians, we are well-qualified
to translate the recommendations into meaningful conversations
with our patients,” said Patricia Fontaine, M.D., MS, an
associate professor and researcher with the University of
Minnesota Department of Family Medicine and Community Health.
“Prior to the USPSTF’s recommendations, I advised my patients to
get a baseline mammogram at age 35 to 40, based on their risk
for breast cancer. We’ll still have those discussions now. But
if a patient says, ‘What is the downside if I wait a year or
two?’ then I say, ‘Let’s look carefully at your risk, and maybe
it’s a possibility. ”
The new guidelines by the USPSTF recommend
screening mammography every two years for women aged 50 to 74
years, instead of every year as previously stated.
The USPSTF also concludes that
current evidence is insufficient to assess the additional
benefits and harms of screening mammography in women 75 years or
older. Finally, the new guidelines say that the
decision to start regular, biennial screening mammography before
the age of 50 years should be an individual one and take patient
context into account, including the patient’s values regarding
specific benefits and harms.
Routine screening can have negative aspects for
women at any age. Potential harms cited by the USPSTF include
unnecessary imaging tests and biopsies in women without cancer,
exposure to radiation from the mammogram, over diagnosis and over
treatment of slow-growing cancers, as well as the inconvenience
and the psychological harms due to false-positive screening
results. These false-alarms are more common in women aged 40 to
49 years.
The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP)
updated its cancer screening recommendations to coincide with
those by the USPSTF based on the evidence report the task force
developed. The AAFP says in determining what is best for each
patient, a person’s medical history, as well as the scientific
evidence regarding the effectiveness of each screening test should
be considered. Family physicians supporting the changes believe
the new recommendations give women the option of figuring out what
is best for them and encouraging individualized discussion with a
trusted doctor.
A useful tool for determining a woman’s risk is
available at
http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/Default.aspx. This tool (not
applicable for a woman with known BRCA-positive hereditary breast
cancer) is for use by health professionals and takes only seconds
to do. It provides detailed risk analysis for lifetime and for the
next 5 years, for example it would conclude, “Based on the
information provided, the woman's estimated risk for developing
invasive breast cancer over the next 5 years is 1.9% compared to a
risk of 1.7% for a woman of the same age and race/ethnicity from
the general U.S. population. This calculation also means that the
woman's risk of NOT getting breast cancer over the next 5 years is
98.1%.”
“Breast cancer is the second-leading cause of
cancer death among women in the United States so this is obviously
an important issue,” said Dr. Fontaine. “Family physicians
need to understand the controversy about mammograms and be
systematic in assessing risk in order to address women’s concerns.
Screening is a valuable tool in detecting and successfully
treating breast cancer, so it should be top priority for a woman
and her physician.”
The Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians is a professional
association of approximately 3,000 family physicians, family
medicine residents and medical students organized to assist family
physicians in providing quality medical care in Minnesota. The MAFP
is the largest medical specialty organization in Minnesota and is a
state chapter of the American Academy of Family Physicians, the
largest medical specialty organization in the United States with
more than 94,000 members.
|